中國小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟的評判尺度—評黃宗智的“過密化”理論

頁數(shù) 8 字數(shù) 9643

摘要：黃宗智提出的以“邊際報酬”為評判尺度的“過密化”理論，是其分析和評判中國小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟的理論基點。用“邊際報酬”概念的源頭——西方經(jīng)濟學(xué)中的“生產(chǎn)函數(shù)”來考察，“過密化”理論有其不嚴(yán)密之處。以建立在西方經(jīng)驗之上的“邊際報酬”概念來評判與西方農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟有天壤之別的中國小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟，更有其無法彌補的局限性。以往，東西方學(xué)者對“過密化”理論的回應(yīng)多停留在表層，很少有人對其理論基點提出置疑，以此為基礎(chǔ)的理論創(chuàng)新更是少之又少。本文主要從西方經(jīng)濟學(xué)的生產(chǎn)論出發(fā)，對“過密化”理論進行分析和評判，以促發(fā)更深的理論思考和更加科學(xué)的理論創(chuàng)新。

關(guān)鍵詞：小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟,評判尺度,“過密化”

Abstract: Phlip Huang’s“Involutionary Theory” is his theoretical BP which was used to analyze and comment on Chinese small-scale peasant economy. Observed from the origin of marginal returns , “Involutionary Theory” isn’t tight. It has limitations to use the concept of marginal returns which is built on western experience to comment on Chinese small-scale peasant economy which has a world of difference from western peasant economy. In the past, most of the respondences to “Involutionary Theory” from western and eastern scholars still stay surface layer. There has few scholars to put forward query to it, and there has fewer theoretical creations. This article uses production theory to comments on “Involutionary theory” in order to promote deeper theoretical ideas and more scientific theoretical creations.

Key word: Small-scale peasant economy Judging standard “Involutionary Theroy”
參考文獻


[1]（美）杜贊奇.文化、權(quán)利與國家:1900—1942年的華北農(nóng)村[M].南京:江蘇人民出版社,1994.
[2]（美）黃宗智.華北的小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟與社會變遷[M].北京:中華書局,2002.
[3]（美）黃宗智.長江三角洲小農(nóng)家庭與鄉(xiāng)村發(fā)展[M].北京:中華書局,2002.
[4] POPKIN Samuel.The rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam[M]. Berkeley:University of California Press,1979.
[5] 史建云.近代華北平原自耕農(nóng)初探[J].中國經(jīng)濟史研究,1994(1).