我國(guó)死刑制度的問(wèn)題探索


頁(yè)數(shù)：22 字?jǐn)?shù)：16245



目 錄
摘 要 Ⅲ
Abstract Ⅳ
引 言 1
一、我國(guó)死刑制度的內(nèi)涵及功能 1
（一）死刑的定義 1
（二）死刑的基本特征 2
（三）死刑的功能 2
二、新中國(guó)死刑問(wèn)題的立法 3
（一）1949—1979年我國(guó)的死刑立法 3
（二）1979年到1997年我國(guó)的死刑立法 4
1、刑法典中的死刑立法 4
2、單行刑法及司法解釋中的死刑 5
（三）1997年《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法》頒布至今的死刑立法 7
三、我國(guó)死刑制度的問(wèn)題完善 8
（一）我國(guó)死刑立法存在的問(wèn)題 8
1、死刑適用的總則性規(guī)定還不完善 8
2、死刑罪名多 8
3、非暴力犯罪死刑罪名過(guò)多 8
4、在某些犯罪的加重犯規(guī)定絕對(duì)適用死刑 8
5、規(guī)定適用死刑的情節(jié)不合理 8
（二）對(duì)我國(guó)死刑制度的完善 9
1.限制死刑罪名的范圍 9
2.規(guī)范適用死刑的情形 9
3.完善死刑適用的對(duì)象 10
4. 充實(shí)刑罰體系，完善有期徒刑、無(wú)期徒刑制度 10
5.規(guī)范死刑立即執(zhí)行的程序 11
四、我國(guó)死刑問(wèn)題的司法現(xiàn)狀及完善 11
（一）摒棄重刑主義，慎重對(duì)待死刑 11
（二）完善死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度 12
（三）規(guī)范死刑司法解釋 13
（四）堅(jiān)持由最高法院行使死刑復(fù)核權(quán) 14
結(jié) 論 15
參考文獻(xiàn) 16
致 謝 17


摘 要
死刑是最嚴(yán)厲的一種刑罰制度，死刑又稱生命刑，是以剝奪人的生命為內(nèi)容的一種刑罰制度，其在刑法的刑罰體系中占據(jù)著重要地位,一直受到歷代歷朝統(tǒng)治者的青睞。然而，自200多年前，意大利著名法學(xué)家貝卡利亞在其代表作《論刑罰與犯罪》一書(shū)中，首次明確提出死刑制度相對(duì)于人類文明的不合理性，由此引起了近現(xiàn)代法學(xué)們激烈的爭(zhēng)論，對(duì)于死刑問(wèn)題，學(xué)界存在兩種觀點(diǎn)，保留死刑和廢除死刑，在廢除死刑成為一種潮流和趨勢(shì)的時(shí)候，我國(guó)選擇保留死刑，是我國(guó)歷史發(fā)展的必然繼承與發(fā)展，符合我國(guó)基本國(guó)情，存置死刑在我國(guó)有著濃厚的社會(huì)土壤和深厚的人文環(huán)境，因此在一個(gè)相當(dāng)長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間里我國(guó)將選擇保留死刑，但一定會(huì)嚴(yán)格限制死刑的適用。本文擬通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)死刑制度的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行介紹和分析,以期對(duì)我國(guó)的死刑制度形成一個(gè)相對(duì)全面的認(rèn)識(shí),進(jìn)而對(duì)現(xiàn)行死刑制度進(jìn)行一些有益的思考,寄希望于對(duì)我國(guó)的死刑制度的完善有所裨益。
具體來(lái)說(shuō)，本文第一部分從死刑的定義，死刑的基本特征，死刑的功能三個(gè)方面闡述了我國(guó)死刑制度的內(nèi)涵和功能，使讀者對(duì)我國(guó)的死刑制度有一個(gè)清晰的認(rèn)識(shí)。第二部分先綜述我國(guó)建國(guó)以來(lái)的死刑立法特點(diǎn)，進(jìn)而通過(guò)對(duì)三個(gè)階段和兩個(gè)《刑法典》的闡述，使我國(guó)有關(guān)死刑的立法進(jìn)程清晰可見(jiàn)。第三部分?jǐn)⑹隽宋覈?guó)死刑制度現(xiàn)階段存在的主要問(wèn)題，通過(guò)仔細(xì)閱讀刑法學(xué)界的研究、看法、觀點(diǎn)，提出了解決這些問(wèn)題的立法方面。第四部分綜述了我國(guó)死刑制度的司法現(xiàn)狀、主要問(wèn)題、以及針對(duì)這些問(wèn)題的對(duì)策和立法、司法、司法解釋的完善。第五部分通過(guò)對(duì)全文的高度概括，結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外死刑制度的實(shí)際情況，指出了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段死刑制度存在的必然和必然向前發(fā)展的客觀真理。
本文在限制死刑方面，著重從立法上、司法上、程序上、監(jiān)督上和死刑緩期執(zhí)行制度等方面進(jìn)行一系列的限制，從而達(dá)到慎用死刑的目的，通過(guò)本文的論述，以求對(duì)我國(guó)的死刑制度形成一個(gè)相對(duì)全面的認(rèn)識(shí)，進(jìn)而對(duì)現(xiàn)行死刑制度進(jìn)行一些有益的思考。由于本人學(xué)識(shí)有限，不足之處，尚請(qǐng)見(jiàn)諒。
關(guān)鍵詞： 死刑政策 死刑制度 主要問(wèn)題 對(duì)策及完善

Abstract
The death penalty is the severest one kind of penalty systems, the death penalty calls the Life sentence, is taking eliminates person's life as the content one kind of penalty system, it occupies emphatically the important place position in the criminal law penalty system, has received all previous dynasties successive dynasties ruler's favor. However, more than 200 years ago, Italian renowned jurist Cesare Bonesana Beccaria, in its representative works "Discuss Penalty And Crime" in a book, proposed explicitly for the first time the death penalty system is opposite in human culture unfairness, from that has caused the near modern legal science intense argument, regarding the death penalty question, the educational world has two viewpoints, the retention death penalty and the other is abolishes the death penalty. In the world death penalty abolishes in the reform hold superiority situation our country to choose the retention death penalty, is our country historical development necessity inherits with develops, tallies with our country fundamental realities of the country, saves sets at the death penalty to have the strong social soil and the deep humanities environment in our country, therefore in quite long time Our country will choose the retention death penalty, but certainly strict limit death penalty's being suitable. This article plans through to carry on the introduction and the analysis to our country death penalty system's present situation, forms a relatively comprehensive understanding by the time to our country's death penalty system, then carries on some beneficial ponders to the present death penalty system, places hopes in has a benefit to our country's death penalty system's consummation.
Specifically speaking, this article first part from death penalty's definition, death penalty's essential feature, death penalty's function three aspects elaborated our country death penalty system's connotation and the function, enable the reader to have a clear understanding to our country's death penalty system. Since the second part has summarized our country to found a nation the first death penalty legislation characteristic, then through to three stages and two "Penal code" the elaboration, causes our country related death penalty's legislative advancement to be clearly discernible. The third part narrated our country death penalty system present stage existence subject matter, through the careful reading criminal law educational world's research, the view, the viewpoint, proposed solves these question legislative aspect. The fourth part summarized our country death penalty system's judicial present situation, the subject matter, as well as in view of the question countermeasure and legislative, judicial, the judicial interpretation consummation. The fifth part through to the full text high summary, unifies the domestic and foreign death penalty system's actual situation, had pointed out our country present stage death penalty system existence's necessity and develops inevitably forward objective truth.
This article in the limit death penalty aspect, emphatically from the legislation, the judicature, the procedure, the surveillance and aspects and so on system of announcing the death sentence with a two-year reprieve and forced labor carries on a series of limits, thus achieves cautiously with death penalty's goal, through this article elaboration, form a relatively comprehensive understanding in order to our country's death penalty system, then carries on some beneficial ponders to the present death penalty system. Because myself knowledge is limited, the deficiency, still invited the excuse me.
Keywords: Death penalty policy ，Death penalty system ，Subject matter ，
Countermeasure and consummation



參考文獻(xiàn)
[9]鮑遂獻(xiàn). 對(duì)中國(guó)死刑問(wèn)題的深層思考[J].法律科學(xué),1993.1
[10]趙秉志. 關(guān)于分階段逐步廢止中國(guó)死刑的構(gòu)想[J].鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版), 2005.
[11]謝望原. 關(guān)于死刑存廢的斷想[J]. 鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版), 2005.5
[12]陳興良.刑種通論[M].人民法院出版社，1993.
[13]陳興良,梁根林.合理地組織對(duì)犯罪的反應(yīng)[J].刑事法學(xué),2002.03.
[14]趙建平. 關(guān)于我國(guó)死刑現(xiàn)狀的思考[J].呼倫貝爾學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),06.8(4)
[15]田文昌,顏九紅.論中國(guó)死刑發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J].當(dāng)代法學(xué). 2005.19(2)
[16]陳興良. 刑罰適用總論[M].中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2006
[17]趙秉志主編,黃京平副主編. 刑法教學(xué)參考書(shū)[M].中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2006
[18]王作富主編,黃京平副主編.刑法[M].人民大學(xué)出版社.2006
[19]趙秉志,郭理蓉.死刑存廢的政策分析與我國(guó)的選擇[J].法學(xué),2004.4
[20]邱興隆. 死刑斷想—從死刑問(wèn)題國(guó)際研討會(huì)談起[J].法學(xué)評(píng)論(雙月刊),2004.5
[21]劉仁文. 死刑政策:全球視野及中國(guó)視角 [J].
[22]邱興隆. 刑罰是什么?一種報(bào)應(yīng)論的解讀[J].刑事法制法學(xué),2000.4
[23]釗作俊. 中國(guó)死刑之現(xiàn)狀與走向[J].鄭州輕工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2004.5(2)
[24]趙秉志主編.中國(guó)刑法[M]法律出版社，1999
[25]趙秉志.死刑改革探索[M].法律出版社.2006
[26]胡云騰.存與廢--死刑基本理論研究[M].中國(guó)人民檢察院出版社,1983
[27]王作富.中國(guó)刑法研究[M].中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社,1988
[28]康均心.理想與現(xiàn)實(shí)[M].中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)出版社,2005
[29] 趙曉耕.中國(guó)法制史[M].中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，2006.04.
[30]張磊.論死刑威懾功能的實(shí)現(xiàn) [J].湛江海洋大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)，2003.05
[31]釗作俊.現(xiàn)代死刑問(wèn)題研究評(píng)述[J].載，中國(guó)刑事法雜志，1999.
[32]高銘暄.略談我國(guó)的死刑立法及其發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J].中國(guó)論文下載網(wǎng)
[33]馬克昌.論死刑緩期執(zhí)行[J].中國(guó)法學(xué)，1999.
[34]趙秉志.新刑法教程[M].中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社，1997.