共20頁，字?jǐn)?shù)總計(jì)：14115
摘 要

眾所周知，在中國(guó)的法學(xué)教育中，判例教學(xué)方法已經(jīng)被廣泛應(yīng)用于教學(xué)活動(dòng)當(dāng)中，并且其在法學(xué)教育中也起到了舉足輕重的作用，這種方法可以很好的使理論與實(shí)際、課堂和現(xiàn)實(shí)相結(jié)合，有利于學(xué)生和老師的互動(dòng)交流，也對(duì)學(xué)生的發(fā)散思維有很大幫助，畢竟法學(xué)傳統(tǒng)教育的邏輯性是很強(qiáng)但是卻少了些對(duì)經(jīng)驗(yàn)事物的關(guān)照，這和實(shí)際中對(duì)法律從業(yè)人員的要求是不合的，所以判例教學(xué)方法是很重要的一種法學(xué)教育方法。但是，由于中國(guó)的特殊國(guó)情以及中國(guó)所采用的大陸法系的法學(xué)體系，使得判例教學(xué)方法在實(shí)踐當(dāng)中遇到了很多問題，并且學(xué)生的反應(yīng)和效果也不是很好，可謂收效甚微。
法學(xué)是一門應(yīng)用性很強(qiáng)的綜合學(xué)科。法學(xué)教育的根本目的之一，在于提高學(xué)生應(yīng)用法律知識(shí)解決實(shí)際問題的能力，案例教學(xué)法對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)這一目的有不可替代的作用。我國(guó)不少專家學(xué)者強(qiáng)調(diào)在高校法學(xué)教學(xué)中采用案例教學(xué)法，對(duì)課堂教學(xué)方法的改革已成為共識(shí)，文章就對(duì)案例教學(xué)的有關(guān)問題作簡(jiǎn)要的分析，并與之交流。
中國(guó)法學(xué)教育中的判例教學(xué)法的現(xiàn)狀如上所述，存在的問題卻不只這些，包括判例的釋義的不準(zhǔn)確性導(dǎo)致在教學(xué)實(shí)踐中所運(yùn)用的判例并不是真正的案例，用以荒唐的案例，在基于解釋法律條文，最終導(dǎo)致又一個(gè)荒唐的判決結(jié)果的產(chǎn)生，而這些問題的根源就在于，中國(guó)法學(xué)無論是在司法實(shí)踐還是在教學(xué)中，所引用的判例很多是編造的，而編造的判例則失去了判例的本來意義。
所以，文章旨在通過分析上述問題，找出原因，并根據(jù)實(shí)際情況和法學(xué)理性邏輯，以找到法學(xué)教育中，判例教學(xué)法的出路——即讓判例成為真正的判例，以彰顯出判例的本來意義。
關(guān)鍵詞：法學(xué)，判例教學(xué)，制度約束，邏輯推理
ABSTRACT

As we all know, in Chinese law education, case method has been widely used in law teaching activity, and also played a significant role in law education, this approach can be very good to theory and practice, classroom and realities Combination will help students and teachers interact more conveniently, and improving divergent thinking of students does much help, after all, the logic of traditional law education is very strong but divergent thinking is very weak which promised, what this is and practice of legal practitioners The requirements are incompatible, so the case method is very important to a law education methods. However, due to Chinese specific national conditions and the law system——civil law used in China, making the case method in practice, who has many problems encountered, and the students’ response and effect are not very good, which can be said to have little effect.
Law is a high applied integrated subject. One of the fundamental purpose of law education is to improve the students’ application law knowledge to solve practical problems, case method for achieving this goal have an irreplaceable role. Many experts and scholars of the College of Law emphasize in the use of case method, and the classroom teaching methods must reform which has become a consensus, and this article has a brief analysis and communication of relevant issues on the case method.
The status in law education in China of teaching in the case method is mentioned above, but is not only these problems above, which also includes inaccuracies in the interpretation of law case in the teaching practice, which is used in is not really case, and using the case for the absurd, then basing on interpretation of the provisions of the law, which results in an absurd verdict. The root of the emergence of causes for these problems is that the Chinese judicial practice of law either in teaching or in the case cited are fabricated, which has lose the original meaning of the case.
Therefore, this article aims at analyzing the problem, which identifies the causes, the actual situation and the legal rational logic to find the solution of the case method in law education —— that is to make the case become the real precedent case so that to highlighting the case’ original significance.


Key words： law, case methods ,institutional constraints, logical reasoning
目 錄

中文摘要 Ⅰ

ABSTRACT Ⅱ

1 緒論 23

2 正文 24
2.1 國(guó)內(nèi)的案例研究 27
2.2 什么是判例 30
2.3 中國(guó)判例教學(xué)之癥結(jié) 32
2.4 出路 33
3 結(jié)論 35

參考文獻(xiàn) 36