論刑法的因果關(guān)系.rar
論刑法的因果關(guān)系,1萬多字包括開題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書，封面，完整論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述，課題申報(bào)審批表，周進(jìn)展記錄表，中期檢查表等整套畢業(yè)資料，內(nèi)容完整，推薦下載！目錄摘要Ⅱabstract Ⅲ引言 1一、我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系概述1（一）因果關(guān)系的定義1（二）因果關(guān)系的特點(diǎn)2（三）因果關(guān)系的研究?jī)r(jià)值 3二、刑法因果關(guān)系的研究現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)論 3...
該文檔為壓縮文件,包含的文件列表如下:
內(nèi)容介紹
原文檔由會(huì)員 lyy1314 發(fā)布
論刑法的因果關(guān)系
1萬多字
包括開題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書，封面，完整論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述，課題申報(bào)審批表，周進(jìn)展記錄表，中期檢查表等整套畢業(yè)資料，內(nèi)容完整，推薦下載！
目 錄
摘 要………………………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
引 言……………………………………………………………………………………… 1
一、我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系概述…………………………………………………………1
（一）因果關(guān)系的定義……………………………………………………………………1
（二）因果關(guān)系的特點(diǎn)……………………………………………………………………2
（三）因果關(guān)系的研究?jī)r(jià)值…………………………………………………………… 3二、刑法因果關(guān)系的研究現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)論…………………………………………… 3
（一）我國(guó)的研究現(xiàn)狀……………………………………………………………………3
1．局限于哲學(xué)的角度…………………………………………………………………………3
2．側(cè)重于偶然因果關(guān)系與必然因果關(guān)系的研究……………………………………………3
3．與行為人主觀心理態(tài)度及刑事責(zé)任完全分離……………………………………………4（二）英美法系及大陸法系的研究現(xiàn)狀………………………………………………5
1．英美法系的研究現(xiàn)狀………………………………………………………………………5
2．大陸法系的研究現(xiàn)狀………………………………………………………………………6
三、重構(gòu)我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系理論……………………………………………………7
（一）弱化哲學(xué)上因果關(guān)系理論………………………………………………………8
（二）借鑒美國(guó)雙層次結(jié)構(gòu)理論………………………………………………………8
（三）確立因果關(guān)系抗辯制度…………………………………………………………9
結(jié)束語………………………………………………………………………………………10
參考文獻(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………… 11
致 謝………………………………………………………………………………………12
摘 要
刑法因果關(guān)系歷來是刑法理論上的一個(gè)重要問題，也是一個(gè)新論迭出的問題，在我國(guó)刑法學(xué)的研究當(dāng)中，中外學(xué)者在對(duì)刑法因果關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究的過程中，發(fā)表了諸多的專著和論文，由此亦在一定的程度上解決了刑法因果關(guān)系的許多問題，然而至今為止，有關(guān)刑法因果關(guān)系的紛爭(zhēng)并未停止，歷史上就有偶然因果關(guān)系說與必然因果關(guān)系說之爭(zhēng)，現(xiàn)在又有高概率之說、條件說、事實(shí)因果關(guān)系與法律因果關(guān)系區(qū)分說之論，這些觀點(diǎn)的出現(xiàn)，表明刑法因果關(guān)系的研究正在深化，為我們進(jìn)一步研究開闊了視野，但同時(shí)又給了我們一種不是隔靴搔癢——抓不到實(shí)處，就是只提出問題卻沒有說明如何解決問題的淺嘗轍止的感覺，刑法學(xué)作為一門應(yīng)用科學(xué)和解釋學(xué)，其立論的出發(fā)點(diǎn)應(yīng)該是解決實(shí)際問題，作為刑法學(xué)的重要課題刑法因果關(guān)系的研究，當(dāng)然也不能例外，但是，從我國(guó)目前有關(guān)這個(gè)問題的研究來看，情況似乎并不如此。而國(guó)外刑法因果關(guān)系的內(nèi)容與結(jié)構(gòu)與我國(guó)存在明顯的差異，美國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系建立在判例法基礎(chǔ)之上，層次清晰、規(guī)則、體系完整。盡管目前刑法理論界不乏走出“必然性”與“偶然性”爭(zhēng)論困境的呼聲，但教學(xué)和司法層面仍然遵循原有理論。因此，有必要對(duì)我國(guó)因果關(guān)系理論進(jìn)行重新思考，構(gòu)建新的刑法因果關(guān)系理論。本文循著我國(guó)學(xué)者門在因果關(guān)系研究的蹤跡，借鑒國(guó)外有關(guān)方面的先進(jìn)理論，從比較的角度，發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的問題，闡述我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系研究的不足之處，并對(duì)重新構(gòu)建提出自己的一點(diǎn)意見和建議。
關(guān)鍵詞：因果關(guān)系 英美法系 抗辯制度
On the causal link between the criminal law
Abstract
Penal causal link between the criminal law theory has always been an important issue, but also on Diechu a new problem in the study of China's Criminal Law, Criminal Law on Chinese and foreign scholars in the causal link between the process of research, published numerous books and papers, This is also a certain extent, resolved the causal link between the criminal law many of the problems, but so far, the causal link between the criminal law did not stop the disputes, there is the history of occasional causal relationship between cause and effect relationship that is bound with that dispute, and now high The probability that the conditions that the causal link between the facts and the law of cause and effect of that distinction, the emergence of these views that the criminal law of cause and effect relationship is deepening, as we further study a broad vision, but also gave us a not Gexuesaoyang - Zhuabu Dao is, is the only question is not how to solve the problem of shallow taste Zhe only the impression that criminal law as an application of science and hermeneutics, the argument should be the starting point of solving practical problems, as the Criminal Law Causal link between the important issue of the Penal Code, of course, is no exception, however, from China's current research on this issue, the situation does not seem to be the case. The United States Criminal Code and the causal relationship between the content and structure of significant differences exist in China, the United States in the establishment of the Criminal Code causal relationship on the basis of case law, the level of clarity, rules, system integrity. Although there are currently out of "inevitability" and "chance" of the plight of controversial calls, but the level of teaching and still follow the original theory. Therefore, it is necessary causal link between the theory of China's re-thinking and build a new Criminal Code causal link between the theory. In this paper, follow China's scholars in the door on the causal link between the traces of foreign parties advanced theories, from a comparative point of view, found the problem, expounded China's Criminal causal link between the inadequacy of the study and proposed re-build their own point Comments and suggestions．
Keywords： Causal relationship；Common law；Defence system
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]黎宏主編.刑法總論問題思考[M].北京:中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社,2007.
[2]張明楷主編.刑法學(xué)[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[3]儲(chǔ)槐植主編.美國(guó)刑法[M].北京:北京大學(xué)出版社,1996.
[4]趙延光主編.中國(guó)刑法原理(總論卷)[M].武漢:武漢大學(xué)出版社,1992.
[5]張紹謙主編.刑法因果關(guān)系研究[M].北京:中國(guó)檢查出版社,1998.
[6]馬克昌主編.犯罪通論[M].武漢:武漢大學(xué)出版社,2000.
[7]賴早興主編.刑法平等論[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
[8]趙秉志主編.刑法解釋研究[M].北京:北京大學(xué)出版社,2007.
[9]李敏主編.論我國(guó)刑法的因果關(guān)系[J].南京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2004,4(4).
[10]楊彩霞主編.刑法因果關(guān)系論之危機(jī)、反思與出路[J].國(guó)家檢查官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2004,12(4).
[11]張紹謙主編.英美刑法理論中的英國(guó)關(guān)系探討[J].黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),1999,1(1).
[12]王寶祥、耿書波主編.歷史的無奈與現(xiàn)實(shí)的困惑[J].新鄉(xiāng)師范等?？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào),2004,18(3).
[13]趙維加主編.論中美刑法因果關(guān)系的差異[J].政治與法律,2005,1(3).
[14]黎邦勇主編.論不作為犯罪的因果關(guān)系[J].黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2006,(6).
[15]張明余主編,關(guān)于刑法因果關(guān)系性質(zhì)的探討[J].湖南公安高等?？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào),2006,(3).
1萬多字
包括開題報(bào)告，任務(wù)書，封面，完整論文，文獻(xiàn)綜述，課題申報(bào)審批表，周進(jìn)展記錄表，中期檢查表等整套畢業(yè)資料，內(nèi)容完整，推薦下載！
目 錄
摘 要………………………………………………………………………………………Ⅱ
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
引 言……………………………………………………………………………………… 1
一、我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系概述…………………………………………………………1
（一）因果關(guān)系的定義……………………………………………………………………1
（二）因果關(guān)系的特點(diǎn)……………………………………………………………………2
（三）因果關(guān)系的研究?jī)r(jià)值…………………………………………………………… 3二、刑法因果關(guān)系的研究現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)論…………………………………………… 3
（一）我國(guó)的研究現(xiàn)狀……………………………………………………………………3
1．局限于哲學(xué)的角度…………………………………………………………………………3
2．側(cè)重于偶然因果關(guān)系與必然因果關(guān)系的研究……………………………………………3
3．與行為人主觀心理態(tài)度及刑事責(zé)任完全分離……………………………………………4（二）英美法系及大陸法系的研究現(xiàn)狀………………………………………………5
1．英美法系的研究現(xiàn)狀………………………………………………………………………5
2．大陸法系的研究現(xiàn)狀………………………………………………………………………6
三、重構(gòu)我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系理論……………………………………………………7
（一）弱化哲學(xué)上因果關(guān)系理論………………………………………………………8
（二）借鑒美國(guó)雙層次結(jié)構(gòu)理論………………………………………………………8
（三）確立因果關(guān)系抗辯制度…………………………………………………………9
結(jié)束語………………………………………………………………………………………10
參考文獻(xiàn)………………………………………………………………………………… 11
致 謝………………………………………………………………………………………12
摘 要
刑法因果關(guān)系歷來是刑法理論上的一個(gè)重要問題，也是一個(gè)新論迭出的問題，在我國(guó)刑法學(xué)的研究當(dāng)中，中外學(xué)者在對(duì)刑法因果關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究的過程中，發(fā)表了諸多的專著和論文，由此亦在一定的程度上解決了刑法因果關(guān)系的許多問題，然而至今為止，有關(guān)刑法因果關(guān)系的紛爭(zhēng)并未停止，歷史上就有偶然因果關(guān)系說與必然因果關(guān)系說之爭(zhēng)，現(xiàn)在又有高概率之說、條件說、事實(shí)因果關(guān)系與法律因果關(guān)系區(qū)分說之論，這些觀點(diǎn)的出現(xiàn)，表明刑法因果關(guān)系的研究正在深化，為我們進(jìn)一步研究開闊了視野，但同時(shí)又給了我們一種不是隔靴搔癢——抓不到實(shí)處，就是只提出問題卻沒有說明如何解決問題的淺嘗轍止的感覺，刑法學(xué)作為一門應(yīng)用科學(xué)和解釋學(xué)，其立論的出發(fā)點(diǎn)應(yīng)該是解決實(shí)際問題，作為刑法學(xué)的重要課題刑法因果關(guān)系的研究，當(dāng)然也不能例外，但是，從我國(guó)目前有關(guān)這個(gè)問題的研究來看，情況似乎并不如此。而國(guó)外刑法因果關(guān)系的內(nèi)容與結(jié)構(gòu)與我國(guó)存在明顯的差異，美國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系建立在判例法基礎(chǔ)之上，層次清晰、規(guī)則、體系完整。盡管目前刑法理論界不乏走出“必然性”與“偶然性”爭(zhēng)論困境的呼聲，但教學(xué)和司法層面仍然遵循原有理論。因此，有必要對(duì)我國(guó)因果關(guān)系理論進(jìn)行重新思考，構(gòu)建新的刑法因果關(guān)系理論。本文循著我國(guó)學(xué)者門在因果關(guān)系研究的蹤跡，借鑒國(guó)外有關(guān)方面的先進(jìn)理論，從比較的角度，發(fā)現(xiàn)其中的問題，闡述我國(guó)刑法因果關(guān)系研究的不足之處，并對(duì)重新構(gòu)建提出自己的一點(diǎn)意見和建議。
關(guān)鍵詞：因果關(guān)系 英美法系 抗辯制度
On the causal link between the criminal law
Abstract
Penal causal link between the criminal law theory has always been an important issue, but also on Diechu a new problem in the study of China's Criminal Law, Criminal Law on Chinese and foreign scholars in the causal link between the process of research, published numerous books and papers, This is also a certain extent, resolved the causal link between the criminal law many of the problems, but so far, the causal link between the criminal law did not stop the disputes, there is the history of occasional causal relationship between cause and effect relationship that is bound with that dispute, and now high The probability that the conditions that the causal link between the facts and the law of cause and effect of that distinction, the emergence of these views that the criminal law of cause and effect relationship is deepening, as we further study a broad vision, but also gave us a not Gexuesaoyang - Zhuabu Dao is, is the only question is not how to solve the problem of shallow taste Zhe only the impression that criminal law as an application of science and hermeneutics, the argument should be the starting point of solving practical problems, as the Criminal Law Causal link between the important issue of the Penal Code, of course, is no exception, however, from China's current research on this issue, the situation does not seem to be the case. The United States Criminal Code and the causal relationship between the content and structure of significant differences exist in China, the United States in the establishment of the Criminal Code causal relationship on the basis of case law, the level of clarity, rules, system integrity. Although there are currently out of "inevitability" and "chance" of the plight of controversial calls, but the level of teaching and still follow the original theory. Therefore, it is necessary causal link between the theory of China's re-thinking and build a new Criminal Code causal link between the theory. In this paper, follow China's scholars in the door on the causal link between the traces of foreign parties advanced theories, from a comparative point of view, found the problem, expounded China's Criminal causal link between the inadequacy of the study and proposed re-build their own point Comments and suggestions．
Keywords： Causal relationship；Common law；Defence system
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]黎宏主編.刑法總論問題思考[M].北京:中國(guó)人民大學(xué)出版社,2007.
[2]張明楷主編.刑法學(xué)[M].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[3]儲(chǔ)槐植主編.美國(guó)刑法[M].北京:北京大學(xué)出版社,1996.
[4]趙延光主編.中國(guó)刑法原理(總論卷)[M].武漢:武漢大學(xué)出版社,1992.
[5]張紹謙主編.刑法因果關(guān)系研究[M].北京:中國(guó)檢查出版社,1998.
[6]馬克昌主編.犯罪通論[M].武漢:武漢大學(xué)出版社,2000.
[7]賴早興主編.刑法平等論[M].北京:法律出版社,2006.
[8]趙秉志主編.刑法解釋研究[M].北京:北京大學(xué)出版社,2007.
[9]李敏主編.論我國(guó)刑法的因果關(guān)系[J].南京林業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2004,4(4).
[10]楊彩霞主編.刑法因果關(guān)系論之危機(jī)、反思與出路[J].國(guó)家檢查官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2004,12(4).
[11]張紹謙主編.英美刑法理論中的英國(guó)關(guān)系探討[J].黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),1999,1(1).
[12]王寶祥、耿書波主編.歷史的無奈與現(xiàn)實(shí)的困惑[J].新鄉(xiāng)師范等?？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào),2004,18(3).
[13]趙維加主編.論中美刑法因果關(guān)系的差異[J].政治與法律,2005,1(3).
[14]黎邦勇主編.論不作為犯罪的因果關(guān)系[J].黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2006,(6).
[15]張明余主編,關(guān)于刑法因果關(guān)系性質(zhì)的探討[J].湖南公安高等?？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào),2006,(3).
